Prime Minister Andy Burnham has said he is open to a formal British state apology for the country’s role in the transatlantic slave trade, a shift in tone from a state that has never formally apologised. He has, however, firmly ruled out paying financial reparations, setting up a difficult conversation at next week’s Commonwealth summit in the Caribbean.
Burnham set out his position in an opinion article for The Guardian, published late on Friday, October 30, and repeated it on Saturday. He called the trade a “brutal and barbaric violation” of the people who were enslaved and said Britain needed to “face up to the past”.
What Burnham actually offered
The prime minister did not apologise. Instead, he proposed what he called a “structured dialogue” with countries and communities affected by the slave trade. Hearing the case for an official apology from the British state would be a central part of that process, he wrote, adding: “I am open to them.”
He also expressed his personal “sorrow and regret” for the suffering of millions of people and acknowledged that the legacy of slavery still shapes the world today. A government source told the BBC that engaging on the issue was “morally the right thing to do”.
On money, he was unambiguous. Burnham argued that British people today cannot be held liable for historical wrongs that took place under different laws in a different age and in which they had no personal part. Reparations, he wrote, are “not the right answer”.
A summit under pressure
The timing is deliberate. The Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting runs from November 1 to 4 in Antigua and Barbuda, and Caribbean leaders are expected to press their long-standing case for reparatory justice there. Those demands are often framed less as cash transfers and more as debt relief, development finance and support for education, health care and climate resilience, Reuters reported.
King Charles III is already touring the region ahead of the meeting. In the Bahamas he acknowledged “the great suffering of the past”, and during the Guyana leg he went to a site where enslaved people had risen up against British authorities.
Burnham’s alternative is a focus on debt. He said he wants to launch a new drive to help vulnerable countries repay over longer periods and at better rates, and that former prime minister Gordon Brown will join the summit to help with that work. In his article, Burnham said more than 40% of the poorest and most vulnerable countries now spend more on interest payments than on health.
How the statement was received
Reaction was mixed. Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley, one of the most prominent advocates for reparations, welcomed the statement and said she would engage in good faith while continuing to seek reparatory justice, the BBC reported. Antigua and Barbuda’s Prime Minister Gaston Browne also welcomed the proposals for practical help, but added that the Caribbean’s position on reparatory justice “remains unchanged”.
Bell Ribeiro-Addy, the MP who chairs the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Afrikan Reparations, welcomed the government’s recognition of Britain’s role but told BBC Radio 4 that the government had stopped short of a state apology, something she said “costs nothing”. She also argued that the debate had focused too heavily on financial payments rather than what campaigners have actually asked for.
Denis O’Brien, founder of The Repair Campaign, called the statement disappointing and urged the government to “give a full and formal apology now”.
The historical record
Between the 15th and 19th centuries, at least 12.5 million Africans were seized from their homes and trafficked across the Atlantic. Britain carried an estimated 3.2 million of them, according to the Transatlantic Slave Trade Database cited by Reuters.
Parliament passed the law abolishing slavery in most of the British Empire in 1833. As part of that settlement, plantation owners, not the people they had enslaved, were compensated for their loss. The BBC notes that the UK only finished repaying the loans taken out to fund those payments in 2015. No British government has formally apologised for slavery or agreed to pay reparations.
Why it matters beyond Britain
Downing Street sees a stronger Commonwealth as a strategic asset at a time when China and Russia are seeking to widen their influence. For member states such as Pakistan, the more practical question may be whether the promised push on debt produces real terms. Several members carry heavy repayment burdens, and any new framework agreed in Antigua could matter more to their budgets than the wording of an apology.
What comes next
The key test is whether Burnham’s openness turns into a formal apology during or after the summit, and what shape the proposed dialogue takes. Caribbean leaders have made clear they will keep reparations on the agenda. For now, the UK has moved on tone and process, while its position on money has not changed.
Related on Global News 47: NHS-Style Social Care Plan Proposed by Burnham
Sources & References
- The Guardian (opinion by Andy Burnham): British people can’t be made to pay for the wrongs of slavery – but we must confront our complicated history
- BBC News: Burnham ‘open’ to calls for slavery apology but not reparations
- The Express Tribune (Reuters): UK PM Burnham says he is ‘open’ to formal apology for slavery, but rules out reparations
- Dawn (AFP): UK PM ‘open’ to slavery apology but not reparations